Saturday, February 11, 2012

John Locke's Theories







John Locke not only set up the Bill of Rights and the Constition, but he shaped the making of America. Of course, he didn’t “make” America with his own hands, and he didn’t discover it, but he did lay down the foundation for us to build on. If John Locke’s theory about knowledge and government was never put to use, America would never be what it is today.

John Locke’s theory was that people was born as a “blank slate.” People are born without knowing anything, and they learn as they grow. Locke believed that there was no human nature, and that everybody chose what they learned, and what they didn’t learn, by experiencing different things. Locke believed that people divided knowledge into two groups: simple, and complex. Simple knowledge is what we learn directly from the world, and cannot be made simpler (ex. The fruit is called “apple.”). Complex knowledge is a compound of simple knowledge. We take the facts, and turn them into an opinion, or idea (ex. We bite into an apple. The apple has a brown spot. It tastes kind of funny. You see a worm.)

Unlike Thomas Hobbes, he thought that people should be reasonable, people are born with rights that other people cannot take away from them, and that people should be able to choose their government. He also thought that people should be able to rebel against the government. Hobbes thought that people should be selfish, be self-interest, and have one person with all power. He thought that the person in charge has rights, and he can tell people what to do, and people must do it. Also, Hobbes thought that if the governor wanted someone dead for no reason, the governor gets his wish granted.

Our Founding Fathers well liked Locke’s theory.Thomas Jefferson read John Locke, agreed with many of his ideas, and felt so strongly that he included them in the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution. In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson stated that the government only has power if the people give it to them. If the government takes away a person’s natural rights (life, liberty, the right to own land), the person has the power to change the government.

Not only was John Locke a philosopher, but he also invented what is now called America. If it weren’t for him, we would not have what is today known as the Bill of Rights. We would not have freedom or rights to select our government. Neither would we have the rights to life, liberty, and to own land.


Here's a video explaining this in detail





Photos courtesy of:
http://krushworth.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/locke-essay.jpg
http://www.utm.edu/research/iep-wp/wp-content/media/locke.jpg




Video courtesy of:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFqbwIzyvRM

6 comments:

  1. Interesting post about Locke! A great introduction.

    Locke was indeed an influential philosopher. As you rightly noted, he had a large impact on Jefferson, and the movement for American independence in the 1770s. I wonder, do you think he is still correct? That the purpose of gov't is to protect natural rights? Or do you think gov't should do more than that?

    Recently my student Isabel wrote about her experience studying Locke, and sources she found useful. You might enjoy reading her blog post: http://ageofex.wordpress.com/2012/01/11/consider-a-book-for-research/

    Keep up the good work in history class, and with blogging.

    Mike Gwaltney
    Instructor, OES
    Portland, OR, USA

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello,

    This was a great post worded well and I agree with you that John locke had a very big part in helping with what we now call the united states of America. I think that the paragraph towards the end about hobbes was really great because it was the bottom line of what hobbes believed. Hobbes believes were the exact opposite of what locke's thought. I think that it is interesting that the constitution, bill of rights, and the declaration of independence say nothing that hobbes believed and they have everything to do with what locke believed. John Locke is a very important person in history that has very good thoughts about people that ended up benefiting the people of the United States of America.

    Great post,

    Colin M.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Maria,
    I thought that you included a lot of facts about locke believing that everyone was born with natural rights. I think that this is an important subject, and I agree with locke. I thought that it was interesting that you talked a little about Hobbesand how he had a different opinion. Do you agree with Locke or Hobbes? Why did you decide to study Locke?
    Annie

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Maria,

    I like how you made bold statements in your introduction and attempted to prove them in the rest of the blog. I liked how you barely mentioned Thomas Hobbes, because it must be hard to talk about Locke without talking about Hobbes. What did Hobbes think? Nevertheless, your blog was interesting and a good read.

    Satch

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Colin,

    John Locke is definitely a very interesting figure, both political and philosophical. I also found it interesting how the constitution, bill of rights, and the declaration of independence say nothing about Hobbes. I also find it interesting how a lot of countries like England switched from absolute monarchy (Hobbes' idea) to multiple figures (Locke's idea). Thank you!


    Hi Annie,
    I would also have to agree with Locke. I think people are able to tell right from wrong, and don't need people telling them all the time, but as John Locke said, people don't always act in accordance with this knowledge. That's why we do need people in charge. I decided to study John Locke because Athena and I did our Teach-a-class on George Berkeley (very interesting guy). John Locke helped argue George Berkeley's philosophy so I decided to look in on him, and I found him quite interesting.


    Hi Sahil,
    Thank you! John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were like opposites. Hobbes thought that people cannot know right and wrong, and in consequence can only live in peace together by if there was a king with absolute power. He also thought that people should be selfish and keep to themselves.

    Maria

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Maria,

    I found your whole blog post quite interesting. I enjoyed how you put in two opinions that were completely opposite, and put in what others thought in that time period, like the forefathers. If I were given a choice on which opinion, I wouldn't be sure which one to do. I believe that Locke and Hobbes are both right, and there are both benefits and disadvantages of having full government power and power to the people.

    I see that you believe that Locke is correct. Do you have second thoughts after having a discussion period in class with Paul? If I remember, we had a debate on the good parts of both of these governments. Also, do you think that power to the people is still necessary in today's world?

    -Kaelin

    ReplyDelete